IS HE GUILTY?
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
Lots of mentioning by OP of Hilton Botha to deflect / evade / obfuscate / etc...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- robgun
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
Up to a 4 count now...still no movement from OP in the canvas...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blueyonder001
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1491
- Thanks: 24
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
he says that he is fighting for his life. What a pity that the girl he shot did not have the opportunity to fight for hers. Here come the tears
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20068
- Thanks: 2653
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
Roux should tell OP to answer the questions quickly instead of digging holes by running his mouth off
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blueyonder001
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1491
- Thanks: 24
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
He is used to controlling people with his big mouth - he bumped the wrong bulldog now
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
mr hawaii Wrote:
> Roux should tell OP to answer the questions
> quickly instead of digging holes by running his
> mouth off
Maybe he'll do that during the break...
If not accidental (didn't have control over gun) then intentional (discharged gun purposefully)...
> Roux should tell OP to answer the questions
> quickly instead of digging holes by running his
> mouth off
Maybe he'll do that during the break...
If not accidental (didn't have control over gun) then intentional (discharged gun purposefully)...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- robgun
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
Oscar needs to go home tonight and get his dictionary out and read up on the meaning of accidently, intention and implication!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
Up to a 5 count now...still no movement from OP on the canvas...that blow to the chin really caught him flush... 
If shooting was 2 "double-tap" as Barry Roux explained, surely first two shots would have awoken one up from their "not thinking" state (brought one to their senses)...before 2 further shots...so even if first 2 shots, at a stretch, were accidental, second 2 shots were definitely intentional...

If shooting was 2 "double-tap" as Barry Roux explained, surely first two shots would have awoken one up from their "not thinking" state (brought one to their senses)...before 2 further shots...so even if first 2 shots, at a stretch, were accidental, second 2 shots were definitely intentional...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- soodum
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
TNaicker Wrote:
> Up to a 5 count now...still no movement from OP on
> the canvas...that blow to the chin really caught
> him flush...
>
> If shooting was 2 "double-tap" as Barry Roux
> explained, surely first two shots would have
> awoken one up from their "not thinking" state
> (brought one to their senses)...before 2 further
> shots...so even if first 2 shots, at a stretch,
> were accidental, second 2 shots were definitely
> intentional...
Roux changed his case to 4 shots in rapid succession instead of 2 double taps
yesterday
> Up to a 5 count now...still no movement from OP on
> the canvas...that blow to the chin really caught
> him flush...

>
> If shooting was 2 "double-tap" as Barry Roux
> explained, surely first two shots would have
> awoken one up from their "not thinking" state
> (brought one to their senses)...before 2 further
> shots...so even if first 2 shots, at a stretch,
> were accidental, second 2 shots were definitely
> intentional...
Roux changed his case to 4 shots in rapid succession instead of 2 double taps
yesterday
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: IS HE GUILTY?
11 years 2 months ago
OP has got emotional a few times but has never ever sounded "female" .....not even close!
His measured/ rehearsed answers are making him look really stupid as He is trying to fit prepared answers to inappropriate questions so they are therefore missing the mark.
4 accidental shots????
Not a good day for Oscar.
His measured/ rehearsed answers are making him look really stupid as He is trying to fit prepared answers to inappropriate questions so they are therefore missing the mark.
4 accidental shots????
Not a good day for Oscar.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.123 seconds