Hassen Adams calls it quits...

All I can say thank god they never backed the horse, can you imagine if this horse opened at 50/1 and was claimed to say 5/1 ,what would be happening now.

First, Mr Adams doesnt call it quits he only threatens to quit. The author of this thread is wrong.

Secondly, if Mr Adams wants to throw his toys out of the cot, well then fine...

keniza999 Wrote:
-

> “The NHA’s Horse Identifier did not scan the
> filly properly and she then wrote the markings on
> the passport to make them match the horse.

Now this for me is new news. This is fraudulent and deliberate and not just negligent. This is a dismissable offence and forget about disciplinary correction.

I wonder if this was the horse identifier's first time to fudge the match?

Mac Wrote:

---

> keniza999 Wrote:
> -
>
> > “The NHA’s Horse Identifier did not scan
> the
> > filly properly and she then wrote the markings
> on
> > the passport to make them match the horse.
>
> Now this for me is new news. This is fraudulent
> and deliberate and not just negligent. This is a
> dismissable offence and forget about disciplinary
> correction.
>
> I wonder if this was the horse identifier's first
> time to fudge the match?

This is shocking but I'm not surprised because without phycometric testing one is bound to employ people with questionable ethics.....a bigger cover up is the question that Karel Mediemma and many others have asked is what is happening at starting stall qualifications that this error was not picked up. Were people like the dismissed horse identifier complicit in not seeing that the correct horses were being passed through the gates and grading them correctly.....:S

Muhtiman Wrote:

---

> Mac Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > keniza999 Wrote:
> > -
> >
> > > “The NHA’s Horse Identifier did not scan
> > the
> > > filly properly and she then wrote the
> markings
> > on
> > > the passport to make them match the horse.
> >
> > Now this for me is new news. This is fraudulent
> > and deliberate and not just negligent. This is
> a
> > dismissable offence and forget about
> disciplinary
> > correction.
> >
> > I wonder if this was the horse identifier's
> first
> > time to fudge the match?
>
> This is shocking but I'm not surprised because
> without phycometric testing one is bound to employ
> people with questionable ethics.....a bigger cover
> up is the question that Karel Mediemma and many
> others have asked is what is happening at
> starting stall qualifications that this error was
> not picked up. Were people like the dismissed
> horse identifier complicit in not seeing that the
> correct horses were being passed through the gates
> and grading them correctly.....:S


I would think that both horses ware passed at the same time and they would not have noticed ,it's no excuse but it can happen........:S