Objection Ruling.

  • ruffian
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 673
  • Thanks: 31

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631960
The irony is that Azzie is on record saying that he has lost faith in the objection system. He said his stable won't lodge objections no matter how bad the interference is and he encourages his stable jockeys not to bother.
Must have been serious money involved in this case though....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ElvisisKing
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 7863
  • Thanks: 911

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631961
Lulan, just maybe trainer azzie told karl to object when they were at the unsaddling box ?

Now azzie gives Karl about + / - 40 rides a month if not more. What then do you think Karls options were. ONLY ONE, object - as crazy as it might seem.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ElvisisKing
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 7863
  • Thanks: 911

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago - 8 years 9 months ago
#631962
Well remembered Ruffian, and that was said not too long ago as well....maybe thats why karl was told to object hmmmmm just a theory

Around July I think.
Last edit: 8 years 9 months ago by ElvisisKing.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SirPuntalot

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • lulan
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631963
Yes elvis , I understand from that point .,, so looking deeper , it seems the azzie money claimed the horse a few times and the stipes collected their envelope for xmas on the way out of the course yesterday ....We have seen so many objections , yes some we can debate on in the past , but this is something new and complete daylight robbery ..This should go down has one of the most brazen robberies in sa history , where no firearms were used but millions of punters robbed ...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82502
  • Thanks: 6452

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631964
Poncey wrote: Are there any replays of the race available?

No replays on Tellytrack and they showed Kenilworth twice this morning, but no sign of Turfies.

Not the best quality and no head on, but the head on only shows NO interference

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • wonbyamile
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4865
  • Thanks: 121

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631965
Been turned into a racist issue on SP comments.

From what I read it sounds like the stipes in this country have no clue and are incompetent. Is there any criteria needed to get a job as a stipe?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ElvisisKing
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 7863
  • Thanks: 911

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago - 8 years 9 months ago
#631966
dashing wrote: on a positive side hollywood have refunded my stake on the real winner

Well done to you dashing, looks like Hollywood refunded only SOME lucky punters but not all. ( win bets only )

I too have been refunded my Win stake by Hollywood, thanks Hollywood.
Last edit: 8 years 9 months ago by ElvisisKing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Sylvester
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 13980
  • Thanks: 1419

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631968

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • davetheflower
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11060
  • Thanks: 534

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631970
davetheflower wrote: I'm being very serious.
It would be interesting to know if the stipe.
A.Wears Glasses,as I know busy people tend to forget to have eye tests.Eyes do deteriorate.
B.Has had a Pinot Noir with lunch
C.Looks a bit skint.IE,is he wearing a ill fitted suit.

Can you post that clip Robert.

Farksake.
I knew I should have been a clairvoyant.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mikesack
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3347
  • Thanks: 201

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631972
Controversial objections have been around for a long long time and the Stripes in the old days were no better.
Take the case of a race in the late 70/early 80's at Scottsville racecourse.

The race was a sprint and the 2 horses involved were Promontory and Great Star.
Promontory won the race but hung onto, bumped and bored Great Star for almost the whole race according to course commentator Ernie Duffield. Now remember Ernie produced Duff's Turf Guide so he had an eagle eye when it came to comments during a race.

An objection was lodged by the Stripes of that day and age.What seemed to be a formality yet the objection was overruled.

Perhaps the fact that Promontory was owned by Bull Brand tycoon Cyril Hurvitz who was a sponsor and patron of Pmb Turf Club swayed the decision against the John and Mary Liley horse Great Star???

Hurvitz sponsored the Bull Brand Jockey's Int. at Scottsville and it was a major highlight on the program at Scottsville back in the day.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SirPuntalot

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82502
  • Thanks: 6452

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago - 8 years 9 months ago
#631976
whoosh wrote: Can someone ask Mr Ferraris if this is the same Stipe that wanted to take away his licence when he removed a trespassing groom from his yard ?

If you need to delete this delete


I've been asking about this and can't get anything confirmed accept that an incident did take place and a groom was trespassing and cheeky to Oom F and Mr F gave the guy a skelp
Last edit: 8 years 9 months ago by Bob Brogan.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • lulan
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Objection Ruling.

8 years 9 months ago
#631982
The 2 stipes who put their hand up to have this upheld should be in charge of soccer matches that end in draws cos they will find excuses to make sure the one team they backed wins even after 90 minutes result is 2 -2 ....If this same chief stipe was the one against Mr ferraris then he obviously have to be removed as he will do similar in the future ..wonder what the enquiry will bring about ..can't wait for that to be published ..whether we get the right version of what happened inside is another story

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.129 seconds

Contact Details

Main Office (HQ)
PO Box 40390
Moreleta Park
Pretoria
0044
+27 (0) 82 785 4357
info@africanbettingclan.com

About A.B.C.

African Betting Clan is established for the upliftment of the sports punter, who enjoys a bet on horse racing, football and other sports, enabling them to voice their views and opinions on all aspects of the sport of their choice, free of charge.

Learn More

T's & C's

The views expressed on this website are not necessarily the views held by the proprietors of the site. Therefore African Betting Clan will not be responsible for any content posted. No persons under the age of 18 years are permitted to gamble. National Responsible Gambling Programme and its toll-free number (0800 006 008)