IS HE GUILTY?

TNaicker Wrote:

---

> robgun Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Not sure who's quote it was, but how true.
> >
> > “Show me a beautiful woman, and I’ll show
> you
> > a man who’s tired of f**king her”
> >
> > Would still love the chance!
>
>
> The lady is dead so the lecherous comments are a
> bit low...show some respect for the dead...


Well said Mr Naicker!

Apologies!
It was not meant in a lecherous context.

TNaicker Wrote:

---

> robgun Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Not sure who's quote it was, but how true.
> >
> > “Show me a beautiful woman, and I’ll show
> you
> > a man who’s tired of f**king her”
> >
> > Would still love the chance!
>
>
> The lady is dead so the lecherous comments are a
> bit low...show some respect for the dead...


i must concur - dead or not she deserves respect and that comment offends

robgun Wrote:

---

> Apologies!
> It was not meant in a lecherous context.


accepted(tu)

Thanks guys, have hidden the comment you objected to

hibernia Wrote:

---

> Thanks guys, have hidden the comment you objected
> to

@hibernia...Thanks...I can understand banter and oftentimes say many things tongue in cheek myself...just some comments we should self-moderate...as censorship has no place in a forum where, I assume, the aim is to promote free thought and comment...

In the pub earlier one guy (lawyer by trade)remarked that OP will probably be going home to practice target shooting with a pic of Mr Nel on a watemelon><

I see we have some idiots on here..(td)

Nel said Pistorius's version of events that he woke up and moved the fans from his balcony into his bedroom was "impossible," disputing the athlete's assertion that police then moved the fans, duvet and curtains - key pieces of evidence - when they arrived at the crime scene.

"Your version is so improbable, that nobody would ever think it's reasonably, possibly true, it's so impossible," said Nel.

Let's think about this objectively, the original cop in charge took the toilet door to his office as he said in his own words, 'he did not trust anybody in the police anymore' There are great uncertainty of who all (Hylton Botha etc) went into the room. The watch that was stolen....the cop that handled the gun without gloves on.

I found this posting on News24. Interesting reading

1. When Oscar did not acknowledged Mrs Steenkamp he was heartless.
2. When he did apologized he was heartless
3. If he cries he is a wimp
4. If he don't cries he is heartless
$. If Oscar tells the truth in Court he is called a liar
6. If he doesn't say what Gerrie wants him to say he doesn't listen to the question
7. If Oscar refuse to acknowledge he did not something wrong he doesn't take responsibility
8. If he does acknowledge he did something wrong he is branded selfish
9. In a couple of times Nel was caught on misleading the court and the judge warned him
10. So far all we heard is statements Nel made that we all along know that this is the case of the state which mean absolutely nothing because they had know proof.
a. Nel turn to ambush methods using a watermelon and compare it to Reevas brain. Also reek of desperation.
b. contaminated crime seen, even van Rensburg said he kept the bathroom door in his office because at that point he trusted nobody in the police.
c. They believe the screams came from Reeva but up to date they could not successfully proofed it. Nel even went as far to say there was a argument but Roux corrected him and say there is no evidence brought to the court to say that there was an argument.
d. Now they turn to whats app messages that is just normal spats between two lovers. No proof there either. Reek of desperation from the states part

What do you think....objectively that is

Ps. I did not edit the posters spelling errors

Ou Ryperd Wrote:

---

> Nel said Pistorius's version of events that he
> woke up and moved the fans from his balcony into
> his bedroom was "impossible," disputing the
> athlete's assertion that police then moved the
> fans, duvet and curtains - key pieces of evidence
> - when they arrived at the crime scene.
>
> "Your version is so improbable, that nobody would
> ever think it's reasonably, possibly true, it's so
> impossible," said Nel.
>
> Let's think about this objectively, the original
> cop in charge took the toilet door to his office
> as he said in his own words, 'he did not trust
> anybody in the police anymore' There are great
> uncertainty of who all (Hylton Botha etc) went
> into the room. The watch that was stolen....the
> cop that handled the gun without gloves on.
>
> I found this posting on News24. Interesting
> reading
>
> 1. When Oscar did not acknowledged Mrs Steenkamp
> he was heartless.
> 2. When he did apologized he was heartless
> 3. If he cries he is a wimp
> 4. If he don't cries he is heartless
> $. If Oscar tells the truth in Court he is called
> a liar
> 6. If he doesn't say what Gerrie wants him to say
> he doesn't listen to the question
> 7. If Oscar refuse to acknowledge he did not
> something wrong he doesn't take responsibility
> 8. If he does acknowledge he did something wrong
> he is branded selfish
> 9. In a couple of times Nel was caught on
> misleading the court and the judge warned him
> 10. So far all we heard is statements Nel made
> that we all along know that this is the case of
> the state which mean absolutely nothing because
> they had know proof.
> a. Nel turn to ambush methods using a watermelon
> and compare it to Reevas brain. Also reek of
> desperation.
> b. contaminated crime seen, even van Rensburg said
> he kept the bathroom door in his office because at
> that point he trusted nobody in the police.
> c. They believe the screams came from Reeva but up
> to date they could not successfully proofed it.
> Nel even went as far to say there was a argument
> but Roux corrected him and say there is no
> evidence brought to the court to say that there
> was an argument.
> d. Now they turn to whats app messages that is
> just normal spats between two lovers. No proof
> there either. Reek of desperation from the states
> part
>
> What do you think....objectively that is
>
> Ps. I did not edit the posters spelling errors

my big question is why did they not call Hilton Botha
I would think he should have been a KEY witness
I wonder if the defense will call him
another question if a SAP member could go so low to steal a watch who says they are not capable of moving evidence?

Why would the police move the fan,duvet and pull the curtains so far back.
He claims these things were tampered with,but the photos were taken before he made he's original statement.The police had no idea what was going to be in that statement at the time the photos were taken..
Oscar,your digging yourself a big hole and have fallen into it,your clinging on to the edge of that hole by your fingertips.

Imagine if OP never made his defence known and put the State to proof of everything. He would probably have been a free man by now??