Scottsville Tuesday

f it believes that the nature of the
interference warrants such action,

mr h that rule definitly wasnt used as if it was then homers horse should have been placed last...the rule that was used is the one i have repeated twice already on this forum

mr hawaii Wrote:

---

> 69.3.2 any HORSE in the RACE was interfered with
> by any other HORSE and/or its
> RIDER and as a result of which the chances of the
> HORSE interfered with were
> jeopardised, the OBJECTION BOARD may, if it
> believes that the nature of the
> interference warrants such action, disqualify the
> HORSE which caused the
> interference.
>
> it

Mr H, that avoids the point!!! () and on Saturday when I was on the bumped horse...??? consistency is what I ask for Mr H, surely it can't be right I lose on both??!! I have such a terrible record with reviews in SA, unbelievable really, truly 90%+ I've lost out, no exaggeration. I rarely back favs and I question whether it is purely coincidence that I nearly always lose out to a shorter priced horse.
And I still am not sure that Jelly, who I stood to win more on, was truly interferred with to the extent that it would have improved its position. Before Jelly checked did it look like getting past... no, and therefore even under the correct ruling it should have remained unaltered.
Anyway, enough if you don't think that the stipes in SA need to improve then that is your opinion, I shall remain firmly in the opposition camp

amazingly all the people that lost money think the objection was ludicrous and others with no interest agree..its clear jelly bean's run was hampered by contador...whether ottimo could beat contador or not doesnt matter as contador must be demoted behind the horse he hampered..i agree saying that the derby objection was wrong..that should have lost the race(pomodoro)

JustinV Wrote:

---

> amazingly all the people that lost money think the
> objection was ludicrous and others with no
> interest agree..its clear jelly bean's run was
> hampered by contador...whether ottimo could beat
> contador or not doesnt matter as contador must be
> demoted behind the horse he hampered..i agree
> saying that the derby objection was wrong..that
> should have lost the race(pomodoro)

I never had a bet

JustinV Wrote:

---

> amazingly all the people that lost money think the
> objection was ludicrous and others with no
> interest agree..its clear jelly bean's run was
> hampered by contador...whether ottimo could beat
> contador or not doesnt matter as contador must be
> demoted behind the horse he hampered..i agree
> saying that the derby objection was wrong..that
> should have lost the race(pomodoro)

You think Jelly would have beaten either of the other horses Justin?

JustinV - all we ask is consistency! Anton was in a matter of days on the receiving end - is it by accident?

all we ask is consistency - i agree 100% with this statement

mr hawaii Wrote:

---

> all we ask is consistency - i agree 100% with this
> statement

But you can't agree with me Mr H???? :S

Homer Wrote:

---

> JustinV - all we ask is consistency! Anton was in
> a matter of days on the receiving end - is it by
> accident?

Here here Homer, that is absolutely the point (tu)

Homer, I agree with ur statement 100%..
Did the rider of My Jelly Bean or the stipes call a race review? Just a question to think about?

there was no time for the rider to call for a review as the stipes had called for it before the horses had reached the enclosure - had the horse not hung no objection - the horse hung objection