HONG KONG RACING 2018

heinrich wrote:

eramutsamaya wrote:

heinrich wrote: explaining it will take to long.But read by Race results on Hkjc.....teetan offered the explanation. than if you watch the race again u will see it is so.also SI has a history of having no early pace. in my humble opinion...teetan did very well...especially given the frantic pace upfront

The pace was too slow..and second half of the field cant quicken enough to be in the finish

You mind if i give some constructive critism??? Anyways,you take it as you want. I like reading up on peoples posts to see if i can learn anything new,be it an amateur or an pro. We all can learn from each other. You are a decent HK tipster but i saw in the past you have 'no sense' of pace whatsoever. If you get that down...you will be VERY GOOD at HK tipping...

The Pace of the race was FRANTIC as i said...a VERY HOT/FAST PACE!!!! 67secs Faster than class at the 800m and 90secs faster at the 1200m. It was nothing to do with the pace of the race for the backmarkers too close off...infact the race suited them FAR FAR BETTER than the winner. Why they didnt get to him,ill leave to you as 'homework' Trust me once you understand that...u will improve your good SR even more. Thats why Sectionals are so valuable...it teaches us alot if we have the time to decipher them...the difficult part is ACTUALLY UNDERSTANDING them....understanding how races are tend to be run.

*Note...I hope this dont offend you in any way,im just trying to help you improve abit(not that i know alot myself...im an amateur aswell)

happy studying

durbs wrote: Heinrich that hkjk website is top class.Explanations for certain runs are there so we know exactly what happened in the running and why it happened.If only we had something like this here as it seems the racing correspondents really know their job and try and keep the racing fraternity up to date.

mydada wrote: i take that the race was over a distance but one race being quicker then class by 67 secs at the 800m is difficult to grasp considering they can travel more then 1 km in that time
im not understanding that unless reading it incorrectly

eramutsamaya wrote:

heinrich wrote:

eramutsamaya wrote:

heinrich wrote: explaining it will take to long.But read by Race results on Hkjc.....teetan offered the explanation. than if you watch the race again u will see it is so.also SI has a history of having no early pace. in my humble opinion...teetan did very well...especially given the frantic pace upfront

The pace was too slow..and second half of the field cant quicken enough to be in the finish

You mind if i give some constructive critism??? Anyways,you take it as you want. I like reading up on peoples posts to see if i can learn anything new,be it an amateur or an pro. We all can learn from each other. You are a decent HK tipster but i saw in the past you have 'no sense' of pace whatsoever. If you get that down...you will be VERY GOOD at HK tipping...

The Pace of the race was FRANTIC as i said...a VERY HOT/FAST PACE!!!! 67secs Faster than class at the 800m and 90secs faster at the 1200m. It was nothing to do with the pace of the race for the backmarkers too close off...infact the race suited them FAR FAR BETTER than the winner. Why they didnt get to him,ill leave to you as 'homework' Trust me once you understand that...u will improve your good SR even more. Thats why Sectionals are so valuable...it teaches us alot if we have the time to decipher them...the difficult part is ACTUALLY UNDERSTANDING them....understanding how races are tend to be run.

*Note...I hope this dont offend you in any way,im just trying to help you improve abit(not that i know alot myself...im an amateur aswell)

happy studying

Thank you Heinrich, im still learning the ropes i dont mind whatever criticism i get.
I actually ddnt watch the race or replay until this morning as i was hooked up with work and i jus used MY assumption that the pace was slow (usually the norm). From my own assessment on ysdays races the track was biased as only 1 race from the whole card (turf course) horses won from off the pace. So even when they go too fast its not easy to be in the finish when you sit at the back ONLY WHEN THE TRACK IS BIASED LIKEE YESTERDAY.

Andycap wrote: Now a question for the guys knowing a little bit more about HK racing...

I have noticed that the She Tin course have different names e.g..
"C+3" Course
"C" Course
"A" Course
"B" Course

Can someone tell me what the difference is between these courses as the standard times remains the same for all the races?

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk

Andycap wrote: Now a question for the guys knowing a little bit more about HK racing...

I have noticed that the She Tin course have different names e.g..
"C+3" Course
"C" Course
"A" Course
"B" Course

Can someone tell me what the difference is between these courses as the standard times remains the same for all the races?

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk

heinrich wrote:

durbs wrote: Heinrich that hkjk website is top class.Explanations for certain runs are there so we know exactly what happened in the running and why it happened.If only we had something like this here as it seems the racing correspondents really know their job and try and keep the racing fraternity up to date.

better than that you wont get anywhere in the world. The questioned teetan abt SI because when a horse doesnt deliver they look into it. They as honest and straightforward as can be over there.