Piere Strydom pack your bags
- neigh
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2132
- Thanks: 442
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
Shield, in this case I cant agree with you. Striker tried to correct his mistake after he saw AF on his inside, too late. His "judgement" let him down. IMHO no shenanigans.
Bob, OTA and Titch good points. Going to be interesting to see the outcome.
Bob, OTA and Titch good points. Going to be interesting to see the outcome.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago - 9 years 9 months agoThe horse that you are referring to , Oriental Tiger was earmarked for a Grade 2 @ Greyville in July long before he made his debut so the stable was clearly aware of his ability to win a maiden in PE and he would have won with or without Gavin in the saddle, the jockey change was made purely to assist Gav in the title chase after the horse we were meant to ride in that race was withdrawn at the acceptance stage,Yvette was in Jhb with Copper Parade who ran at Turffontein the day after Oriental Tiger won in PE so was unaware of the fact that Gav was available, after conferring with Gav I called Yvette and asked if he could ride OT, Yvette in turn discussed this with the owners who agreed to the Jockey change and this was done on the morning of the race meeting at 8am, worth noting that not a word was said about the change until the horse won and only then did all hell broke loose..the fact that the horse then went on to run 2nd in the Umkhomazi Stakes in his next start is proof enough that he would have won the maiden with or without Gav,I apologize if the truth does not fit in with your conspiracy theory train of thought but it is what it is,however seeing as this incident took place in April and 5 months on you remain an active player it would appear that the multitude of rotten and crooked goings on within the industry have not deterred you...Shield wrote: titch don't be a hypocrite
we never forget what happened at Fairview with the first timer and lerena
very clean this game
Give everything but up!
Last edit: 9 years 9 months ago by Titch.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Shield
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
titch
flaunt was right
remember the other horse got scratched
hope u enjoyed the 8/1
the only reason the horse was 8/1 was because of the weaker jockey was originally booked
Keep bluffing yourself
everyone can see corruption except you
ps don't go hide like last time
flaunt was right
remember the other horse got scratched
hope u enjoyed the 8/1
the only reason the horse was 8/1 was because of the weaker jockey was originally booked
Keep bluffing yourself
everyone can see corruption except you
ps don't go hide like last time
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Shield
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
titch please don't reply again
we all know the truth
don't spew lies now
we all know the truth
don't spew lies now
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davetheflower
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11060
- Thanks: 534
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
C
If your so sure and I'm not saying your wrong,why do you punt on horseracing?
You could try clean sports like athletics and cricket.
Shield wrote: titch
flaunt was right
remember the other horse got scratched
hope u enjoyed the 8/1
the only reason the horse was 8/1 was because of the weaker jockey was originally booked
Keep bluffing yourself
everyone can see corruption except you
ps don't go hide like last time
If your so sure and I'm not saying your wrong,why do you punt on horseracing?
You could try clean sports like athletics and cricket.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago - 9 years 9 months ago
@ Shield
None so blind as those who will not see... clearly the truth is trumped by sensationalism so you are right I wont bother to respond again I will leave you to wallow in your factually flawed and warped belief...
None so blind as those who will not see... clearly the truth is trumped by sensationalism so you are right I wont bother to respond again I will leave you to wallow in your factually flawed and warped belief...
Give everything but up!
Last edit: 9 years 9 months ago by Titch.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82508
- Thanks: 6460
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
Going of track again guys already deleted 10 posts from this thread
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
produce your red card bob with a week suspension. That should cool DTF and Colinp down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BATMAN
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1379
- Thanks: 195
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
I re watched the race and didnt hear the comentator calling it race over.I remember the case with marcus and the used that tactic as the the commentator was calling that race over a long time before the line.In anycase no matter what the commentator says during the race it should never be used to pass blame.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Titch
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago - 9 years 9 months agoTitch wrote: How the commentator can be held accountable in ANY way is beyond me :S :S The fact that there has been such an uproar and that a 3 month suspension is being discussed as a possible punishment should surely show that everyone who watched the race was of the opinion that Striker should have won and had we been asked to predict the winner 50m from the line we all would have selected Dublin Rebel without exception...the fact that Nico called it as he (and everyone else) saw it is what one should expect from a race caller, so why , with the benefit of hindsight should he be blamed for something that was completely out of his hands...
Titch ,you don't read so well ....................jocks can hear commentaries and I know of many cases where they have been affected by them .........HOWEVER I state Striker is responsible/accountable so I don't,nor did I say,that I blame Nico for this incident!
REFER TO : ultimate responsibility.............never exonerated him ever!
(Nico does,however pre-empt a lot of "wrong" results...............that might be his fault!!!!)
Last edit: 9 years 9 months ago by rob faux.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago - 9 years 9 months agoBATMAN wrote: I re watched the race and didnt hear the comentator calling it race over.I remember the case with marcus and the used that tactic as the the commentator was calling that race over a long time before the line.In anycase no matter what the commentator says during the race it should never be used to pass blame.
Perhaps you might have heard(very late in the race) : .."but it's all Dublin Rebel..........." that could be interpretated as similar :woohoo:
The problem was that it wasn't "all Dublin Rebel " ....the winner was challenging!
Last edit: 9 years 9 months ago by rob faux.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82508
- Thanks: 6460
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months agoPlease Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.121 seconds