Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82511
- Thanks: 6460
Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months ago
Why have the Stipes not mentioned the Jockey being escorted from Fairview on Friday by the Police?
Ps latest I heard he never received bail and was remanded
Ps latest I heard he never received bail and was remanded
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20065
- Thanks: 2653
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months ago
I think they try their best to hide such things
The following user(s) said Thank You: ElvisisKing
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20065
- Thanks: 2653
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months agoPlease Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Prish007
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 479
- Thanks: 73
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months ago
Not a horse racing issue from what I read in the news yesterday
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20065
- Thanks: 2653
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months agoPrish007 wrote: Not a horse racing issue from what I read in the news yesterday
Not sure if he had rides but Stipes reports indicate that Jockey stood down Medical reasons, intoxication(years ago Jock stood down because otherJocks protested because he was drunk - reports reflected that) Family commitment is also given as a reason in reports or travel issues - If the Jock did not have any rides and was not replaced on his mounts then the report does not have to included a reason or even mention anything just as if a punter is arrested for stealing on-course - I don't know the facts of this case but if he had rides and was replaced then a reason should be given.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Sammy Silver
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4615
- Thanks: 1079
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months ago
Who is the jockey involved?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82511
- Thanks: 6460
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months agoSammy Silver wrote: Who is the jockey involved?
We’ll keep the name off abc until the court case
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Over the Air
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2948
- Thanks: 721
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months agoBob Brogan wrote:Sammy Silver wrote: Who is the jockey involved?
We’ll keep the name off abc until the court case
Best that you do Bob er......
I hope they stretching that sick bastards naught while he's inside.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ElvisisKing
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Prish007
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 479
- Thanks: 73
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months ago
Easy to work out. Article I think said it was a 40 year old jockey
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mossel
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 713
- Thanks: 151
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months ago
He probably made a fortune just saying. And now all in the know will know
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mossel
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 713
- Thanks: 151
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months ago
Also known as the plakkie man
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AJ Yorker
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 403
- Thanks: 73
Re: Why nothing in Friday’s Stipes report?
3 years 11 months agoMossel wrote: Also known as the plakkie man
That's the best way to describe him. :woohoo:
Richard Fourie is the greatest...
The following user(s) said Thank You: ElvisisKing
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.112 seconds