Explanation on this payout...
- Politician
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
Could some Clanner or Vee please explain the payout below. If someone was to catch 50% of the trifecta (R2 Chepstow ) why would the payouts show such a huge carryover. thanks
1ST 11 Verus Delicia (ire)
2ND 4 Swendab (ire)
3RD 3 Stonecrabstomorrow (ire)
16.40
3.60
1.20
15.40
SW
4-11 14.20
3-11 155.40
3-4 37.30
SW CO 1909.71
EX 11-4 86.20
TF
11-4-3
1677.50
TF CO
20766.57
OFFICIAL
SCR: Nil
TF: 4
1ST 11 Verus Delicia (ire)
2ND 4 Swendab (ire)
3RD 3 Stonecrabstomorrow (ire)
16.40
3.60
1.20
15.40
SW
4-11 14.20
3-11 155.40
3-4 37.30
SW CO 1909.71
EX 11-4 86.20
TF
11-4-3
1677.50
TF CO
20766.57
OFFICIAL
SCR: Nil
TF: 4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jp abdol
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
I would surely also like to know, I mean if you win 50% you should win @ least 10k?
-D
Anyway it seems you're not that important a Politician so they won't comment>
<
Me, i'm just a mug Punter and how dare O question them?:S

Anyway it seems you're not that important a Politician so they won't comment>

Me, i'm just a mug Punter and how dare O question them?:S
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JAMES BLOND
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
Politican you will find the answers on this thread, was discussed a few days ago
www.africanbettingclan.com/forum/phorum-...39,412039#msg-412039
or just type uk trifectas in search box for more posts.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
TRIFECTA £1677.50 Part won. Pool: £2,236.73 - 0.13 winning units. Pool of £1,938.21 carried over to Saturday
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- naresh
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6386
- Thanks: 1497
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
Punters are only scrutinizing the carryover Payouts. There are number of Payouts when there is a so called fancied result (like an outsider runs 2nd) and the Payout is massive. Yesterday Kempton Race 2 was an example where in a 10 horse field the Trifecta paid over R800. The favorite did run off the board but the 1st and 2nd in that race was near the top of the bookmakers board after the favorite. Only take a Trifecta if you going for outsiders in their big meeting like Ascot for example. Someone is bound to catch the Trifecta in the UK full unit so you can reap the awards. That said the UK Trifecta is become a farce. I now have to choose the races I take the Trifecta carefully or be one of the unhappy punters when I see the Payout.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mikesack
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3348
- Thanks: 201
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
How on earth do swingers get carried over when the pool should be divided amongst the WINNING TICKETS FFK'SAKE.:S(td)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mikesack
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3348
- Thanks: 201
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
hibernia Wrote:
> TRIFECTA £1677.50 Part won. Pool: £2,236.73 -
> 0.13 winning units. Pool of £1,938.21 carried
> over to Saturday
IN THE INSTANCES WHERE THE POOL IS NOT WON BY A FULL TICKET EG. -50 % THEN THE DECLARED DIVIDEND SHOULD REFLECT THE WHOLE OF THE NETT POOL AMOUNT AND NOT THE AMOUNT THAT WAS PAID OUT TO THE RATIO OF WINNING TICKETS IN THIS CASE SHOWN AS PART WON.
DIVIDEND MUST SHOW AS 2,236--73 POUND.:X
Not only VEE but there are others who should respond, have even made a request for Winning Ways to address these inconsistencies, all falling on deaf ears.
> TRIFECTA £1677.50 Part won. Pool: £2,236.73 -
> 0.13 winning units. Pool of £1,938.21 carried
> over to Saturday
IN THE INSTANCES WHERE THE POOL IS NOT WON BY A FULL TICKET EG. -50 % THEN THE DECLARED DIVIDEND SHOULD REFLECT THE WHOLE OF THE NETT POOL AMOUNT AND NOT THE AMOUNT THAT WAS PAID OUT TO THE RATIO OF WINNING TICKETS IN THIS CASE SHOWN AS PART WON.
DIVIDEND MUST SHOW AS 2,236--73 POUND.:X
Not only VEE but there are others who should respond, have even made a request for Winning Ways to address these inconsistencies, all falling on deaf ears.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- naresh
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6386
- Thanks: 1497
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
mikesack Wrote:
> How on earth do swingers get carried over when the
> pool should be divided amongst the WINNING TICKETS
> FFK'SAKE.:S(td)
If you take the swinger for 1 pound in the UK is almost R15 to R16 at the exchange rate. The minimum bet for the swinger is R2 in South Africa which is 2 times but when you convert this to pounds you only getting like one eight of the pool. So a one time swinger needs to be taken in actual fact sixteen times in South Africa before for it to be can caught for 1 pound. Then there must be a minimum number of times in pounds the swinger must be played. So if its 5 pounds, the swinger will need to be taken 80 times in rands for it to be caught with no carryover. By the way in France last year, I caught a carryover swinger in France on Hollywood. There were no winners on Saftote. I got paid out 1 third of the pool (
)
> How on earth do swingers get carried over when the
> pool should be divided amongst the WINNING TICKETS
> FFK'SAKE.:S(td)
If you take the swinger for 1 pound in the UK is almost R15 to R16 at the exchange rate. The minimum bet for the swinger is R2 in South Africa which is 2 times but when you convert this to pounds you only getting like one eight of the pool. So a one time swinger needs to be taken in actual fact sixteen times in South Africa before for it to be can caught for 1 pound. Then there must be a minimum number of times in pounds the swinger must be played. So if its 5 pounds, the swinger will need to be taken 80 times in rands for it to be caught with no carryover. By the way in France last year, I caught a carryover swinger in France on Hollywood. There were no winners on Saftote. I got paid out 1 third of the pool (

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mikesack
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3348
- Thanks: 201
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
Politician Wrote:
> Could some Clanner or Vee please explain the
> payout below. If someone was to catch 50% of the
> trifecta (R2 Chepstow ) why would the payouts show
> such a huge carryover. thanks
>
>
> 1ST 11 Verus Delicia (ire)
>
> 2ND 4 Swendab (ire)
> 3RD 3 Stonecrabstomorrow (ire)
> 16.40
> 3.60
> 1.20
> 15.40
> SW
> 4-11 14.20
> 3-11 155.40
> 3-4 37.30
> SW CO 1909.71
> EX 11-4 86.20
> TF
> 11-4-3
> 1677.50
> TF CO
> 20766.57
>
>
> OFFICIAL
>
> SCR: Nil
> TF: 4
The Win, Place, Swinger , Exacta and Trifecta payouts are identical in S.A. to UK only difference is substitute RAND for the Pound. So can we get some clarification as to how the commingling is worked out, what rate of exchange and what ratio of the pool S.A. punters are allocated???
> Could some Clanner or Vee please explain the
> payout below. If someone was to catch 50% of the
> trifecta (R2 Chepstow ) why would the payouts show
> such a huge carryover. thanks
>
>
> 1ST 11 Verus Delicia (ire)
>
> 2ND 4 Swendab (ire)
> 3RD 3 Stonecrabstomorrow (ire)
> 16.40
> 3.60
> 1.20
> 15.40
> SW
> 4-11 14.20
> 3-11 155.40
> 3-4 37.30
> SW CO 1909.71
> EX 11-4 86.20
> TF
> 11-4-3
> 1677.50
> TF CO
> 20766.57
>
>
> OFFICIAL
>
> SCR: Nil
> TF: 4
The Win, Place, Swinger , Exacta and Trifecta payouts are identical in S.A. to UK only difference is substitute RAND for the Pound. So can we get some clarification as to how the commingling is worked out, what rate of exchange and what ratio of the pool S.A. punters are allocated???
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Warren
-
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 56
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
Correct me if I am wrong but it seems as if they are using it as a sales gimmick to try & attract mug punters to play more.
Listen to the way the teletrack presenters express themselves when they talk about the carry overs.
Listen to the way the teletrack presenters express themselves when they talk about the carry overs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Politician
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
Still waiting like a fool for an official explanation, Does anyone have Vees contact number?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Re: Re: Explanation on this payout...
11 years 11 months ago
I just thought only 0.13% was caught?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.123 seconds