Are we near the bottom yet?

the question asked is are we near the bottom yet the answer is nowhere near

brasss Wrote:

---

> Despite the punters being robbed did they not
> think the punters would cause a riot if the fav
> was not withdrawn besides the turnover they lost
> in the last 3 races. They deserve everything they
> get

---

Well races 7-9 are being run on the 24th - so no turn over lost there, and they added another 120K to the meet on the 30th, so they will lure more money based on that...

an utter disgrace, the stipes monitoring that race on course should be brought to book...... a rotten decision not to call this horse a non runner, leave the result if they so wish, but refund the fav. backers.

will the rules be amended after this debacle ? we don't want a repeat do we !

ElvisisKing Wrote:

---

> an utter disgrace, the stipes monitoring that
> race on course should be brought to book...... a
> rotten decision not to call this horse a non
> runner, leave the result if they so wish, but
> refund the fav. backers.
>
> will the rules be amended after this debacle ?
> we don't want a repeat do we !


I have sent a request to the NHA asking for a ruling as to the intention of rule 65.1.13.1 which I believe was the more appropriate,and would have caused a fraction of the controversy,if utilised.
Lets wait and see if I get an answer!

Wouter Wrote:

---

> brasss Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Despite the punters being robbed did they not
> > think the punters would cause a riot if the fav
> > was not withdrawn besides the turnover they
> lost
> > in the last 3 races. They deserve everything
> they
> > get
>
> ---
>
> Well races 7-9 are being run on the 24th - so no
> turn over lost there, and they added another 120K
> to the meet on the 30th, so they will lure more
> money based on that...


race 9 is not being run on sunday