Hollywoodbets

  • Thor
  • Thor's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2718
  • Thanks: 451

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836319
I will wait for Dev to hopefully reply as for me the logic is exactly what Durbz is saying based on the risk factor.

If i compare it it should be exactly as if one is taking a Double with 11/1+7/10

You are also wrong here - The bet should not be a straight double as they are related. But there is a certain percentage of the double that you would get, but definitely should be more than the odds of 11/1 at the very least. What percentage though, I am not able to answer, and I doubt you are going to get a conclusive enough answer from anyone to take this up successfully.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • durbs
  • durbs's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 7704
  • Thanks: 1849

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836327
Ok just checked this now with Milan vs Udinese.
Milan to win 0.45
Giroud to score anytime 1.25
Total odds 2.28
That seems legitimate
Gregory check your bet again and just make sure,if you got less odds for your bet just phone Hollywood and explain to them I'm sure they will listen.
Naresh there is no way in hell a higher risk should ever give you lower odds,it's just logic.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Over the Air
  • Over the Air's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2924
  • Thanks: 708

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836328
The odds are wrong what is wrong with you people?

It makes no difference whether a bet is linked or not, how is it logic that adding a second bet with the associated risk results in a lower return? Those odds if correctly quoted and not a bet in running, are 100% INCORRECT.

Recently James Goodman and Hollywood were involved in a slinging match about an incorrect price offered by Hollywood involving Wigan being relegated. They won their court case on the fact that the price offered was clearly a mistaken one. This should apply to your bet too.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • gregorypillay123
  • gregorypillay123's Avatar Topic Author
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 595
  • Thanks: 94

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836380
Thanks to you all.What should be dine as the next steps.I queried with their helpline and the reply was its been resulted and pad correctly.It not about the money for but us punters loose 1000$ daily but we need to fight a fair fight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Bob Brogan's Avatar
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 80646
  • Thanks: 6168

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836390
There is no way it should be under the 11/1 of the anytime scorer

Man Utd could still have lost and drew

So why would the client have taken less than 11/1 (anytime scorer) and stand a chance to lose?
The following user(s) said Thank You: TNaicker

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Bob Brogan's Avatar
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 80646
  • Thanks: 6168

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836391
Looking on Ladbrokes now for this weekend's game

Mguire is 15/2 to score anytime and Utd are 1/3 to win the match and the Bet Builder is offering 17/2

a point bigger than the anytime goal odds
The following user(s) said Thank You: TNaicker

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • naresh
  • naresh's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6353
  • Thanks: 1482

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836392
There is no way it should be under the 11/1 of the anytime scorer

Man Utd could still have lost and drew

So why would the client have taken less than 11/1 (anytime scorer) and stand a chance to lose?

Bob, I have tried checking what price Maguire was to score anytime. The best I saw was 10/1 according to an Irish newspaper. Most bookmakers in South Africa the odds are 1 and can reach to 2 points less. He said initially it was 35/1 the odds. United was 7/10. That means Maguire was close to 20/1 anytime if it did work out 35s and remember this is for taking a "normal" double. Most websites and results have Maguire to score with a header around 14s to 17s. So I am presuming in South Africa Maguires was around 7/1 anytime. The only way we can determine if the bet was correctly paid out by finding the true odds of the bookmaker for Maguire to score and the Odds of United.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • naresh
  • naresh's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6353
  • Thanks: 1482

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836394
Go to any bookmaker offering Betbuilder.

Leeds vs Spurs.

Select

Spurs is at 8/10 (United was trading around 7/10)

David Sanchez to score anytime 8/1 (Maguire to score anytime was around 9/1 in South Africa with bookmakers showing odds of him scoring)

The Betbuilder works out only 8/1 dependent on which bookmaker you using.

This is the best scenario as United was playing away and the odds are similar.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • durbs
  • durbs's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 7704
  • Thanks: 1849

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836397
Juve 0.65 to win
Arthur to score anytime 10-1
And the odds are 7.16-1

Naresh is 100% right
Sorry to say but this is daylight robbery and should be reported to the gambling board.
I know it's up to us to check the odds but the bookies should never be able to offer reduced odds with the risk factor being higher.
They catching the punter nicely.
The following user(s) said Thank You: mikesack

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • durbs
  • durbs's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 7704
  • Thanks: 1849

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836398
Milan to win 0.45
Giroud to score anytime 1.25
Total odds 2.28
This one seems fair though.
The following user(s) said Thank You: TNaicker

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • naresh
  • naresh's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6353
  • Thanks: 1482

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836400
Juve 0.65 to win
Arthur to score anytime 10-1
And the odds are 7.16-1

Naresh is 100% right
Sorry to say but this is daylight robbery and should be reported to the gambling board.
I know it's up to us to check the odds but the bookies should never be able to offer reduced odds with the risk factor being higher.
They catching the punter nicely.

Its a related bet therefore the odds reduce. Even the bookies in overseas the odds in Betbuilders are similar. Its a mugs bet. They playing on the punter to choose up to 6 different results in the same game and entice them to get "big" odds. After your third choice of result your bet becomes harder to catch in my opinion.

Also note that if you choose for example 2 results you can take it for R1 but to back them in singles you need R2. Thats why the odds also reduces.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • durbs
  • durbs's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 7704
  • Thanks: 1849

Re: Hollywoodbets

2 years 1 month ago
#836407
I get what you saying Naresh but really they just catching the uninformed punter here.
It just doesn't make any logical sense to take that double at all.
When taking those betbuilders they don't show you the single odds so if you haven't checked before hand what the single bets odds are you wouldn't know you being taken for a ride.
This to me is cheating the punter and is very dishonest by all the bookies.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.538 seconds