27 July Vaal

Over the Air wrote: de Kock in the 5th would only need 2 working legs to beat that lot

Kel wrote: @Administrator. Yes please. That would be fine.

Kel wrote: @Administrator. Thanks!

Form Fundi wrote:

Deeno wrote:

Lucky_Dude wrote: You not worried about the De Kock first timer Deeno?

No. Should I be worried??
La Collossa now 4/10. Having said that, we have all seen 4/10 shots been rolled over in recent times.

IMO the 4/10 is too short. Punting shouldn't be about buying money.

Deeno wrote:

Form Fundi wrote:

Deeno wrote:

Lucky_Dude wrote: You not worried about the De Kock first timer Deeno?

No. Should I be worried??
La Collossa now 4/10. Having said that, we have all seen 4/10 shots been rolled over in recent times.

IMO the 4/10 is too short. Punting shouldn't be about buying money.

FF
I beg to differ.
For me it is about showing a profit.

In this case, it is 70% return on investment cos I took 7/10 yesterday

Form Fundi wrote:

Deeno wrote:

Form Fundi wrote:

Deeno wrote:

Lucky_Dude wrote: You not worried about the De Kock first timer Deeno?

No. Should I be worried??
La Collossa now 4/10. Having said that, we have all seen 4/10 shots been rolled over in recent times.

IMO the 4/10 is too short. Punting shouldn't be about buying money.

FF
I beg to differ.
For me it is about showing a profit.

In this case, it is 70% return on investment cos I took 7/10 yesterday

I hear you and I respect your decision, for me with a few exceptions I 'don't back 2yr olds that are in the red. The 2yr olds all improve at different rates and Serendipity was less than a length behind La Collossa last run.

Lucky_Dude wrote:

Winning_Post wrote: Another one if you managed to grab the 8/1 yesterday is PATRICK, should win easily today.

I don't see what you see in this one. What am I missing?