EPL winner
- Farawaysaint
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1579
- Thanks: 168
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months agoBob Brogan wrote: Who would have expected all 3 big sides to draw yesterday
Southampton,Chelsea and Man City ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- chrisb
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 345
- Thanks: 28
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months agoFarawaysaint wrote:Bob Brogan wrote: Who would have expected all 3 big sides to draw yesterday
Southampton,Chelsea and Man City ?
NICE ONE

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
Well I backed Chelsea before the season began and traded out at 1/5.I am hoping that Man City will draw alongside or even overtake in Jan, so we can do a repeat!
Have all the faith in the "special one"
Have all the faith in the "special one"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
MCan City are at their most vulnerable when 2-0 up it seems.That is just the result of the lack of discipline in this side..........will be no match for Chelsea when the BMT counts IMO.
(They look a lot better when Lampard comes on-they are lucky to be keeping him the whole season!)
(They look a lot better when Lampard comes on-they are lucky to be keeping him the whole season!)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82527
- Thanks: 6462
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
Although very boring to watch Chelsea are by far the best team in the league
City don't half miss Aquero
City don't half miss Aquero
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months agoBob Brogan wrote: Although very boring to watch Chelsea are by far the best team in the league
City don't half miss Aquero
Just b4 Xmas you told us all that United look like the champions elect :lol:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Farawaysaint
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1579
- Thanks: 168
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months agoBob Brogan wrote: Although very boring to watch Chelsea are by far the best team in the league
City don't half miss Aquero
Agree with you about Chelsea.Though we drew with them we spent the last 30 mins defending.
Having said that we had a good win today.To be honest we should have got 4 or 5.
Arsenal very poor -on the day .
Still marching!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82527
- Thanks: 6462
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
Anyone want a horse or soccer team beat
Pm me and I will Jonah them on the forum
Pm me and I will Jonah them on the forum

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TNaicker
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 6803
- Thanks: 2221
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
Spurs come back from 0-1 at 18 min to lead 3-1 at half time... :ohmy:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
get on Chelsea at 10/1. They are capable of still winning this match.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rob faux
-
Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
It is amazing how the middle of Dec to the end of Jan every year turns the league positions around a lot ,and then settles down back to form............wonderful time to be trading!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- KReddy
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 655
- Thanks: 30
Re: EPL winner
10 years 5 months ago
Well done spurs always good watching Jose moan
And Frank keeps picking up points for city more salt to the wounds
And Frank keeps picking up points for city more salt to the wounds
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.118 seconds