MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

  • CnC 306
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 36613
  • Thanks: 7392

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago - 10 years 7 months ago
#517740
City denied two stone wall penalties. Ref bottled the 2nd one because if he had given it then United would be down to 9 men.
Last edit: 10 years 7 months ago by CnC 306.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

WSB CPT MET ANTE POST
  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82519
  • Thanks: 6460

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517744
Justices served, city should have been clear by now

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mikesack
  • Topic Author
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3348
  • Thanks: 201

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517745
Good game for Yahya Toure this far................... :cheer:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Englander
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11538
  • Thanks: 829

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517757
Did neutrals enjoy that game? I thought it was dull and United were uninspired at best and their passing, first half particularly, was woeful at times while City played a pretty negative game. Come back and read that apparently people think United played well, not in my book.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82519
  • Thanks: 6460

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517760

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

formgrids
  • CnC 306
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 36613
  • Thanks: 7392

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517767
Englander wrote: Did neutrals enjoy that game? I thought it was dull and United were uninspired at best and their passing, first half particularly, was woeful at times while City played a pretty negative game. Come back and read that apparently people think United played well, not in my book.[/quoute

ordinary game and not much for the likes of Chelsea or for that matter Southampton to worry about.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mikesack
  • Topic Author
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3348
  • Thanks: 201

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517777
Man City will continue on their winning ways and CSKA Moscow can expect a hammering of over 3 goals at least.

The ban on CSKA fans in effect means no away seats for the visitors and the match tickets have now been sold out, with the club generously offering a buy 1 get 1 free ticket to the home fans to fill the stadium. B)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • davetheflower
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11060
  • Thanks: 534

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517782
Englander wrote: Did neutrals enjoy that game? I thought it was dull and United were uninspired at best and their passing, first half particularly, was woeful at times while City played a pretty negative game. Come back and read that apparently people think United played well, not in my book.

How much have United spent,trying to guarantee 3rd or 4th?
£210 million is the answer..
Di Maria will make Torres seem a bargain,he can't defend and he's corners were woeful.
Daley Blind is to slow
Rojo is overrated after a decent World Cup
Smalling can't handle pressure
Van Persie has lost pace.
Valencia is useless.

Only players that looked ok were De Gea,Shaw and surprisingly Fellaini.
That's the lowest ammount of points United have had after 10 games since pre Ferguson.

LVG,said judge him after 3 months,three words
STILL IN DECLINE

Apart from

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • davetheflower
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11060
  • Thanks: 534

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517788
Manchester United after 10 games under Moyes: 17 points.
Manchester United after 10 games under Louis van Gaal: 13 points.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Pirhobeta
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 24792
  • Thanks: 1603

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517799
davetheflower wrote: Manchester United after 10 games under Moyes: 17 points.
Manchester United after 10 games under Louis van Gaal: 13 points.

De fence rests it's case... :P :P :P

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

betfred
  • Deeno
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 8174
  • Thanks: 483

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517815
davetheflower wrote:
Englander wrote: Did neutrals enjoy that game? I thought it was dull and United were uninspired at best and their passing, first half particularly, was woeful at times while City played a pretty negative game. Come back and read that apparently people think United played well, not in my book.

How much have United spent,trying to guarantee 3rd or 4th?
£210 million is the answer..
Di Maria will make Torres seem a bargain,he can't defend and he's corners were woeful.
Daley Blind is to slow
Rojo is overrated after a decent World Cup
Smalling can't handle pressure
Van Persie has lost pace.
Valencia is useless.

Only players that looked ok were De Gea,Shaw and surprisingly Fellaini.
That's the lowest ammount of points United have had after 10 games since pre Ferguson.

LVG,said judge him after 3 months,three words
STILL IN DECLINE

Apart from

WHERE YOU GOT 210 MILLION FROM..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • davetheflower
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 11060
  • Thanks: 534

Re: MANCHESTER DERBY NO.168 ON SUNDAY

10 years 7 months ago
#517816
agra wrote:
davetheflower wrote:
Englander wrote: Did neutrals enjoy that game? I thought it was dull and United were uninspired at best and their passing, first half particularly, was woeful at times while City played a pretty negative game. Come back and read that apparently people think United played well, not in my book.

How much have United spent,trying to guarantee 3rd or 4th?
£210 million is the answer..
Di Maria will make Torres seem a bargain,he can't defend and he's corners were woeful.
Daley Blind is to slow
Rojo is overrated after a decent World Cup
Smalling can't handle pressure
Van Persie has lost pace.
Valencia is useless.

Only players that looked ok were De Gea,Shaw and surprisingly Fellaini.
That's the lowest ammount of points United have had after 10 games since pre Ferguson.

LVG,said judge him after 3 months,three words
STILL IN DECLINE

Apart from

WHERE YOU GOT 210 MILLION FROM..




De Maria £60 million
Falcao £44 million loan deal
Blind £14 million
Shaw £27 million
Rojo £16 million
Fellani £27 million
Juan Mata £37 million

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.123 seconds

Contact Details

Main Office (HQ)
PO Box 40390
Moreleta Park
Pretoria
0044
+27 (0) 82 785 4357
info@africanbettingclan.com

About A.B.C.

African Betting Clan is established for the upliftment of the sports punter, who enjoys a bet on horse racing, football and other sports, enabling them to voice their views and opinions on all aspects of the sport of their choice, free of charge.

Learn More

T's & C's

The views expressed on this website are not necessarily the views held by the proprietors of the site. Therefore African Betting Clan will not be responsible for any content posted. No persons under the age of 18 years are permitted to gamble. National Responsible Gambling Programme and its toll-free number (0800 006 008)