P6 Maths Lesson.

fogwils Wrote:

---

> WYSIWYG. 10c is 10% of R1 no matter how you look(tu)
> at it.
>
> If everybody plays the same amount the pool
> remains the same but everyone theoretically has 10
> times more chance of winning therefore 10 times
> more winning tickets then payouts 10 times less.
> Theoretically therefore absolutely no difference
> between between a 10c P6 and a 10% of a R1 P6.


The key word here is 'theoretically' - imo

Yes U are correct Frodo, the operative word is 'Theoretically' and that is why I used it.

With Stats U can prove anything U want to, just arrange and load variables until the answer is the one U are looking for.

I really can't see why we are all bitching about whats done
It's done and there's absolutely nothing we can do about it
Lets just and bear it
If we don't like it,nobody's forcing us to play it
We are happy with the rule for the jackpot, so whats two extra legs gonna do?
Why not just take a smaller %?

I look at it this way:
Carry-overs will happen and the big punters will pounce!
They will invest so much in the P6 hoping for the big payout,and then...
When the favourites arrive in the first 2/3 legs they'll shit themselves,praying for bombs that don't arrive

In the end,us small punters will also have our day

Thor Wrote:

---

> Well, its very clear mikesack is the only actual
> thinker here

Hey...I was at work...

fogwils [ PM ]
Re: P6 Maths Lesson. new
September 10, 2013 12:48PM Registered: 2 years ago
Posts: 606
Thor Wrote:

---

> There is a difference. Why dont you try and read
> the difference above.

Yes Thor I TRIED to read ur post but again U come with a sarcastic reply (see bold), which is the lowest form of wit.

My suggestion is that U should approach a Mathematician to clarify what U clearly do not understand.
Reply Quote Report

mr fugwils Thor has given his perspective on the 10c per unit for those that are not that mathematically oriented or clued up,and yet you dont comprehend it and advise him to approach a mathematician,it is you who should approach a specialist to enlighten your dim wit?

johnnycomelately Wrote:

---

> I really can't see why we are all bitching about
> whats done
> It's done and there's absolutely nothing we can do
> about it
> Lets just and bear it
> If we don't like it,nobody's forcing us to play
> it
> We are happy with the rule for the jackpot, so
> whats two extra legs gonna do?
> Why not just take a smaller %?
>
> I look at it this way:
> Carry-overs will happen and the big punters will
> pounce!
> They will invest so much in the P6 hoping for the
> big payout,and then...
> When the favourites arrive in the first 2/3 legs
> they'll shit themselves,praying for bombs that
> don't arrive
>
> In the end,us small punters will also have our day
>

I still find taking the catching the straight line P6 100x for R50 or whatever....beneficial....

In the new rules, it is all about couplings NOT 10c or R1.00 per unit.
The R1.00 per unit bet has brought along fractional betting which, was not available originally.

If you look at today's results in the p6, couplings made no difference in yet another huge payout.

Pirhobeta Wrote:

---

> johnnycomelately Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > I really can't see why we are all bitching
> about
> > whats done
> > It's done and there's absolutely nothing we can
> do
> > about it
> > Lets just and bear it
> > If we don't like it,nobody's forcing us to play
> > it
> > We are happy with the rule for the jackpot, so
> > whats two extra legs gonna do?
> > Why not just take a smaller %?
> >
> > I look at it this way:
> > Carry-overs will happen and the big punters
> will
> > pounce!
> > They will invest so much in the P6 hoping for
> the
> > big payout,and then...
> > When the favourites arrive in the first 2/3
> legs
> > they'll shit themselves,praying for bombs that
> > don't arrive
> >
> > In the end,us small punters will also have our
> day
> >
>
> I still find taking the catching the straight line
> P6 100x for R50 or whatever....beneficial....


Lol I think we'll be farming backwards then, err...unless thats what we're doing now?:S

sidali Wrote:

---

> fogwils [ PM ]
> Re: P6 Maths Lesson. new
> September 10, 2013 12:48PM Registered: 2 years
> ago
> Posts: 606
> Thor Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > There is a difference. Why dont you try and
> read
> > the difference above.
>
> Yes Thor I TRIED to read ur post but again U come
> with a sarcastic reply (see bold), which is the
> lowest form of wit.
>
> My suggestion is that U should approach a
> Mathematician to clarify what U clearly do not
> understand.
> Reply Quote Report
>
> mr fugwils Thor has given his perspective on the
> 10c per unit for those that are not that
> mathematically oriented or clued up,and yet you
> dont comprehend it and advise him to approach a
> mathematician,it is you who should approach a
> specialist to enlighten your dim wit?

Are U Thor's spokesman. Talking of 'dim wit' please at least try to spell my name correctly before talking sh1t, comprehend.