Flamingo Park 26/8/13

FT backed from 16/1 to 22/10 and draws a blank......this game is not for the faint-hearted

Thats me done

keniza999 Wrote:

---

> FT backed from 16/1 to 22/10 and draws a
> blank......this game is not for the faint-hearted


In THEORY the horse should have won.

On the training gallops you don't get squeezed.

Unusual successful start for the day for me! Bx exacta 1,6,8. Quartet fb 1,6,8 x F. Box swingers 1,6,8.

For those of you who take the Jackpot Quickmix, or Jackpot Mixa with Hollywood:

Tabonline erroneously advertised the same horses to be running in leg 3 as in leg 2 and have since decided that the field will qualify in the 3rd leg.

DUCHESS CATHERINE - If the form of the winner of the first is to believed then you can banker this in your PA

Dev Wrote:

---

> For those of you who take the Jackpot Quickmix, or
> Jackpot Mixa with Hollywood:
>
> Tabonline erroneously advertised the same horses
> to be running in leg 3 as in leg 2 and have since
> decided that the field will qualify in the 3rd
> leg.


Thanks for the update Dev. (tu) Phumulela on top form again. :S

shrek Wrote:

---

> keniza999 Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > FT backed from 16/1 to 22/10 and draws a
> > blank......this game is not for the
> faint-hearted
>
>
> In THEORY the horse should have won.
>
> On the training gallops you don't get squeezed.

Well done englander, right on the spot.

shrek Wrote:

---

> Dev Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > For those of you who take the Jackpot Quickmix,
> or
> > Jackpot Mixa with Hollywood:
> >
> > Tabonline erroneously advertised the same
> horses
> > to be running in leg 3 as in leg 2 and have
> since
> > decided that the field will qualify in the 3rd
> > leg.
>
>
> Thanks for the update Dev. (tu) Phumulela on top
> form again. :S

They have corrected it on their field sheet on the website - but the team here tell me it was announced on Tellytrack the field would apply for leg 3. I can't find it as official anywhere on their website.

Hi Everyone, has anyone heard anything from the Shams?

Thanks

C Lensley's 2nd choice was actually his better one!

C Lensley your feedback is not required but do know this from now on you can't be trusted.

Absolutely disgusting!

Luckily I have a better, Way With Words, than you!