Over the Air wrote: My take on this is simple
Vee is letting his top line staff do what they are paid for, he cant be expected to do their jobs as well as his own.
If I am understanding things, a default judgement was made against the individual, and this individual has this on appeal? If this is the case then it is no different to jocks who go through the legal process in regards to suspensions and in effect the NHA hands are tied. Perhaps the rules are the problem here?
The individual is guilty but has appealed. Why don't you name and shame, there is no reason that you cannot.
On a final point - I agree with what Mark says. The NHA are quick to deliver judgement and publish when individuals are found guilty, but do not do this when the tables are turned. We still await multiple finds of staff incompetence. Starters, judges, stipes etc. This is the sign of an organisation that believes it does no wrong. A dangerous thing.
Sham Racing wrote: OTA tell me what happens when a bank gets Judgement. You automatically go onto blacklist till you have your judge rescinded ..No stories with Bullshit of applying to have judge rescinded stories .Mr X did not appeal judgement with NHRA like a jockey has to
Sham Racing wrote: Agree with both you and Oscar ,Dave...Vee was always open and available however not anymore. He knew I was trying to get hold of him about Mr X but just ignored it